The effect of bias in relative performance appraisal

  • Hirokazu Yamamoto Kobe University
Keywords: relative performance appraisal, biased contests, appraisal for administrative work, appraisal for sales, harsh conditions, two periods

Abstract

This study examines how managers’ biases affect the performance of their employees under relative performance appraisal. First, in case that performance cannot be measured quantitatively (as for administrative work), given a small reward, the findings suggest that the manager’s bias increases the employees’ level of effort and given a large reward, the bias decreases efforts. Examining cases over two periods, usually, bias toward an employee who performed better in the first period increases the total profit. Moreover, a bias leads to lower efforts in cases where performance can be measured quantitatively (as for sales). Furthermore, by establishing harsh conditions such as dismissing employees with lower evaluations, overall efforts may be increased by a bias against an underperforming employee.  The overall findings suggest that the organizational performance improves through implementing a bias toward better performing employees.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Che, Y., Gale, I., 2003. Optimal design of research contests. The American Economic Review 93, 646–671.
Drugov, M., Ryvkin, D., 2017. Biased contests for symmetric players. Games and Economic Behavior 103, 116–144
Ederer, F., 2010. Feedback and motivation in dynamic tournaments. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 19, 733–769.
Meyer, M.A., 1992. Biased contests and moral hazard: Implications for career profiles. Annals of Economics and Statistics 25/26, 165–187.
Prendergast, C., Topel, R.H., 1996. Favoritism in organizations. Journal of Political Economy 104, 958–978.
Ridlon, R., Shin, J., 2013. Favoring the winner or loser in repeated contests. Marketing Science 32, 768–785.
Tsoulouhas, T., Knoeber, C.R., Agrawal, A., 2007. Contests to become CEO: Incentives, selection and handicaps. Economic Theory 30, 195–221.
Published
2022-12-03
How to Cite
Yamamoto, H. (2022). The effect of bias in relative performance appraisal. Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management, 17(1), 51-65. Retrieved from http://scitecresearch.com/journals/index.php/jrbem/article/view/2147
Section
Articles