Patent Protection, Intelligence and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Investigation
Abstract
Extant literature on the link between patent protection and economic growth have yielded inconclusive results. In this study, we aim to engage in this debate by conjecturing that intelligence moderates the effect of patent protection on economic growth. Using annual data of 88 nations from 1970 to 2013 we find that patent protection has positive effect on growth only after accounting for the interaction between IQ and IPR. Indeed, we find that the interaction term is negative and statistically significant suggesting that countries with higher level of intelligence (above 90 points) can offset the negative effect of weak IPR protection. The results remain robust for a battery of robustness tests.
Downloads
References
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. Handbook of economic growth, 1, 385-472.
Azevedo, M. L., Afonso, Ó., & Silva, S. T. (2014). Endogenous growth and intellectual property rights: A north–south modeling proposal. Economic Modelling, 38, 112-120.
Bartels, J. M., Ryan, J. J., Urban, L. S., & Glass, L. A. (2010). Correlations between estimates of state IQ and FBI crime statistics. Personality and individual differences, 48(5), 579-583.
Bergh, A., & Henrekson, M. (2011). Government size and growth: a survey and interpretation of the evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 25(5), 872-897.
Burhan, N. A. S., Mohamad, M. R., Kurniawan, Y., & Sidek, A. H. (2014). The impact of low, average, and high IQ on economic growth and technological progress: Do all individuals contribute equally?. Intelligence, 46, 1-8.
Carl, N. (2015). Can intelligence explain the overrepresentation of liberals and leftists in American academia?. Intelligence, 53, 181-193.
Campos, N. F., Dimova, R. D., & Saleh, A. (2010). Whither corruption? A quantitative survey of the literature on corruption and growth.
Daniele, V. (2013). Does the intelligence of populations determine the wealth of nations?. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 46, 27-37.
Doucouliagos, H., & Ulubaşoğlu, M. A. (2008). Democracy and economic growth: a meta‐analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 61-83.
Fleisher, B., & Zhou, M. (2010). Are patent laws harmful to developing countries? Evidence from China (No. 09-07).
Gould, D. M., & Gruben, W. C. (1996). The role of intellectual property rights in economic growth. Journal of development economics, 48(2), 323-350.
Hu, A. G., & Png, I. P. (2013). Patent rights and economic growth: evidence from cross-country panels of manufacturing industries. Oxford Economic Papers, gpt011.
Imam, A. (2005). How Patent Protection Helps Developing Countries. AIPLA QJ, 33, 377.
Jones, G., & Schneider, W. J. (2006). Intelligence, human capital, and economic growth: A Bayesian averaging of classical estimates (BACE) approach. Journal of economic growth, 11(1), 71-93.
Kanyama, I. K. (2014). Quality of institutions: Does intelligence matter?.Intelligence, 42, 44-52.
Laik, K. (2005). Role of intellectual property in economic growth. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 10(6).
Lynn, R. (2012). IQs predict differences in the technological development of nations from 1000 BC through 2000 AD. Intelligence, 40(5), 439-444.
Lynn, R., & Vanhanen, T. (2009). Intelligence and the Wealth and Poverty of Nations.
Lynn, R., & Vanhanen, T. (2012). Intelligence. A unifying construct for the social sciences. London: Ulster Institute for Social Research
Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407-437.
Nikolaev, B., & Salahodjaev, R. (2016). The role of intelligence in the distribution of national happiness. Intelligence, 56, 38-45.
North, D. C. (1989). Institutions and economic growth: An historical introduction. World development, 17(9), 1319-1332.
Park, W. G. (2008). International patent protection: 1960–2005. Research policy, 37(4), 761-766.
Park, W. G., & Ginarte, J. C. (1997). Intellectual property rights and economic growth. Contemporary Economic Policy, 15(3), 51-61.
Potrafke, N. (2012). Intelligence and corruption. Economics Letters, 114(1), 109-112.
Przeworski, A. (2004). Democracy and economic development. Mansfield & R. Sisson (Eds.), The evolution of political knowledge. democracy, autonomy, and conflict in comparative and international politics, 300-324.
Rodriguez, F., & Rodrik, D. (2001). Trade policy and economic growth: a skeptic's guide to the cross-national evidence. In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000, Volume 15 (pp. 261-338). MIT Press.
Rushton, J. P., & Templer, D. I. (2009). National differences in intelligence, crime, income, and skin color. Intelligence, 37(4), 341-346.
Salahodjaev, R. (2015a). IQ and the wellbeing of nations.
Salahodjaev, R. (2015b). Democracy and economic growth: The role of intelligence in cross-country regressions. Intelligence, 50, 228-234.
Salahodjaev, R. (2015c). Intelligence and shadow economy: A cross-country empirical assessment. Intelligence, 49, 129-133.
Salahodjaev, R. (2016). Intelligence and deforestation: International data. Forest Policy and Economics, 63, 20-27.
Salahodjaev, R., & Azam, S. (2015). Intelligence and gender (in) equality: Empirical evidence from developing countries. Intelligence, 52, 97-103.
Salahodjaev, R., & Yuldashev, O. (2016). Intelligence and greenhouse gas emissions: Introducing Intelligence Kuznets curve.
Sattar, A., & Mahmood, T. (2011). Intellectual property rights and Economic growth: Evidences from high, middle and low income countries. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 163-186.
Templer, D. I., & Rushton, J. P. (2011). IQ, skin color, crime, HIV/AIDS, and income in 50 US states. Intelligence, 39(6), 437-442.
Weede, E. (2004). Does human capital strongly affect economic growth rates? Yes, but only if assessed properly. Comparative Sociology, 3(2), 115-134.
TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT
JRBEM is pleased to undertake the publication of your contribution to Journal of Research in Business Economics and Management.
The copyright to this article is transferred to JRBEM(including without limitation, the right to publish the work in whole or in part in any and all forms of media, now or hereafter known) effective if and when the article is accepted for publication thus granting JRBEM all rights for the work so that both parties may be protected from the consequences of unauthorized use.
