Reduce customer variability and improve service quality - The case of hotel industry
Abstract
The present study defines customers’ uncertainty and variations as ‘customer variability’, and it is systematically categorized into six types; ‘arrival variability’, ‘request variability’, ‘explanation variability’, ‘capability variability’, ‘effort variability’, and ‘variability in subjective preference’. The study also organises the strategic actions that can be adopted to reduce the adverse effects of the six kinds of customer variability, which are divided into four categories; ‘classic accommodation’, ‘classic reduction’, ‘low-cost accommodation’, and ‘uncompromised reduction’.
This research then conducts an empirical study to investigate the implementation and effectiveness of these strategic actions for the hotel industry in Taiwan. From the analytic results, it can be found that the hotels favour the use of ‘classic accommodation’ actions to overcome customer variability. Most of the strategic actions belonging to the other three categories are relatively neglected by the hospitality industry, but there are of potentially effective actions to overcome the customer variability. The study concludes that hotels need to pay more attention to these neglected actions in order to reduce the adverse affect on service quality caused by customer variability, and then raise the customer loyalty.
Downloads
References
viewpoint. Journal of Marketing, 58, 95-106.
[2] Deming, W.E. (1986), Out of Crisis, Cambridge, MA, MIT. Press.
[3] Fitzsimmons, J. A. and Fitzsimmons, M. J. (2008). Service Management: Operations, Strategy, and Information
Technology. 6th Edition. NY: McGraw-Hill.
[4] Fornell, C., Johnson, Michael D., Anderson, Eugene W., Cha, Jaesung, & Bryant, Barbara Everitt (1996). The
American customer satisfaction index: Nature, purpose, and findings. Journal of Marketing, 60, 7-16.
[5] Frei, F.X. (2006). Breaking the trade-off between efficiency and service. Harvard Business Review, 84(11), 92-
101.
[6] Kellowway, E.K. (1998). Using LISREL for Structural Equation Modelling: A Researcher’s Guide, Thousand
Oaks: Sage Publications, USA.
[7] Kim, Woo Gon, and Cha, Youngmi, (2002). Antecedents and consequences of relationship quality in hotel
industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 21, 321-338.
[8] Litwin, M.S. (1995). How to Measure Survey Reliability and Validity. Sage Publication, London.
[9] Nunnally, J.C., & Berstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric Theory. New York, McGraw Hill.
[10] Parasuraman, A. Zeithaml, V. A. & Berry L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its
implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41-50.
[11] Shoemaker, Stowe, & Lewis, Robert C. (1999). Customer loyalty: the future of hospitality marketing. Journal
of Hospitality Management, 18(4), 345-370.
[12] Sohel-Uz-Zaman, Abu Saleh Md. & Anjalin, Umana, (2011). Evolution of service: Importance,
competitiveness and sustainability in the new circumstances. Journal of Service Science and Management, 4,
253-260.
[13] UNCTAD Handbook of Statistics (2010). United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Geneva,
2010.
[14] Vargo, Stephen L., & Lusch, Robert F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of
Marketing, 68(January), 1–17.
[15] Yang, C.C. (2006). Establishment of a quality-management system for service industries. Total Quality
Management, 17(9), 1129–1154.
[16] Yang, C.C. (2009). Service Quality. Hwa Tai Publishing, Taipei.
[17] Yang, C.C. (2011). Implementation and effectiveness of strategic actions used to reduce customer variability.
The Service Industries Journal, 31(3-40, 527-544.
[18] Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, Pablo, Suárez-Acosta, Miguel A., & Aguiar-Quintana, Teresa (2013). Hotel guests’
responses to service recovery: How loyalty influences guest behaviour. Cornall Hospitality Quarterly, online.
Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Marketing and HR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
