The Ambidextrous Effects of Path Dependence

  • Hyunsang Pyo Joint Forces Military University, Daejeon, Korea
  • Seungwha Andy Chung School of Business, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
Keywords: Path Dependence, Lock-in, Learning Capability, R&D Intensity, Organizational Slack, Related Diversification, Unrelated Diversification

Abstract

The research idea of this study is to explore the ambidextrous effects of self-reinforcing mechanisms on organizational path dependence. In this paper, we present a conceptual model based on the duration of R&D intensity: the longer a firm maintains its R&D intensity, the more it will engage in diversification. In addition, we apply the effects of R&D intensity duration to the organizational slack effect. When a firm‟s level of organizational slack is high and is combined with duration of R&D intensity, it will create the explorative learning capability of the firm. On the contrary, if a firm‟s level of organizational slack is low and is combined with duration of R&D intensity, it will create the lock-in path of the firm. We can apply this idea to both the explorative learning capability and the lock-in path via the type of firm‟s diversification. The explorative learning capability tends to be coupled with the unrelated diversification, whereas the lock-in path tends to be coupled with related diversification.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anon., 2010. Path dependence and path creation: Alternative theoretical and methodological perspectives on strategy, innovation and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 47(4), pp. 733-5.

Banker, R. D., Wattal, S. and Plehn-Dujowich, J. M., 2011. R&D versus acquisitions: Role of diversification in the choice of innovation strategy by information technology firms. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(2), pp. 109-44.

Barney, J. B., 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), pp. 99-120.

Chen, Y. S., Shih, C. Y. and Chang, C. H., 2012. The effects of related and unrelated technological diversification on innovation performance and corporate growth in the Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. Scientometrics, pp. 1-18.

Chiu, Y. and Liaw, Y., 2009. Organizational slack: Is more or less better? Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(3), pp. 321-42.

Cohen, M. D., March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P., 1972. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), pp. 1-25.

Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A., 1989. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99, pp. 569-96.

Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A., 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), pp. 128–52.

Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G., 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJL Prentice-Hall.

Dierickx, I. and Cool, K., 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), pp. 1504-11.

Dimick, D. E. and Murray, V. V., 1978. Correlates of substantive policy decisions in organizations: The case of human resource management. Academy of Management Journal, 21(4), pp. 611-23.

Eisenhardt, K. M. and Martin, J. A., 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp. 1105–21.

Garcia-Vega, M., 2006. Does technological diversification promote innovation? An empirical analysis for European firms. Research Policy, 35(2), pp. 230-46.

Granstrand, O. and Oskarsson, C., 1994. Technology diversification in “MUL-TECH” corporations. Engineering Management, 41(4), pp. 355-64.

Granstrand, O., Patel, P. and Pavitt, K., 1997. Multi-technology corporations: Why they have ‘distributed’ rather than ‘distinctive core’ competencies. California Management Review, 39(4), pp. 8-25.

Katila, R. and Ahuja, G., 2002. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), pp. 1183-94.

Lee, P. M. and O’Neill, H. M., 2003. Ownership structures and R&D investments of US and Japanese firms: Agency and stewardship perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 46, pp. 212-25.

Levinthal, D. A. and March, J. G., 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp. 95-112.

Lin, B. W., Chen, C. J. and Wu, H. L., 2006. Patent portfolio diversity, technology strategy, and firm value. Engineering Management, 53(1), pp. 17-26.

March, J. G., 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), pp. 71−87.

Moses, O. D., 1992. Organizational slack and risk-taking behavior: Tests of product pricing strategy. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 5(3), pp. 38-54.

Mowery, D. C., 1981. The emergence and growth of industrial research in American manufacturing, 1899-1945. Stanford University.

Ng, D. W., 2007, A modern resource based approach to unrelated diversification. Journal of Management Studies, 44(8), pp. 1481-502.

Nohria, N. and Gulati, R., 1996. Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), pp. 1245-64.

Palepu, K., 1985. Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), pp. 239-55.

Quintana-García, C. and Benavides-Velasco, C. A., 2008. Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification. Research Policy, 37(3), pp. 492-507.

Siedentopp, J. and Söllner, A., 2009. Path dependence through corporate political activity. In: Schreyogg, G. and Sydow, J., ed. The hidden dynamics of path dependence: Institutions and organizations. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 71-93.

Suzuki, J. and Kodama, F., 2004. Technological diversity of persistent innovators in Japan: Two case studies of large Japanese firms. Research Policy, 33(3), pp. 531-49.

Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G. and Koch, J., 2009. Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review, 34(4), pp. 689–709.

Thompson, J. D., 1967. Organization in action. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

Vergne, J. P. and Durand, R., 2010. The missing link between the theory and empirics of path dependence: Conceptual clarification, testability issue, and methodological implications. Journal of Management Studies, 47(4), pp. 736-59.

Published
2016-03-22
How to Cite
Pyo, H., & Chung, S. (2016). The Ambidextrous Effects of Path Dependence. Journal of Progressive Research in Social Sciences, 3(3), 215-222. Retrieved from http://scitecresearch.com/journals/index.php/jprss/article/view/665
Section
Articles