The Ambidextrous Effects of Path Dependence
Abstract
The research idea of this study is to explore the ambidextrous effects of self-reinforcing mechanisms on organizational path dependence. In this paper, we present a conceptual model based on the duration of R&D intensity: the longer a firm maintains its R&D intensity, the more it will engage in diversification. In addition, we apply the effects of R&D intensity duration to the organizational slack effect. When a firm‟s level of organizational slack is high and is combined with duration of R&D intensity, it will create the explorative learning capability of the firm. On the contrary, if a firm‟s level of organizational slack is low and is combined with duration of R&D intensity, it will create the lock-in path of the firm. We can apply this idea to both the explorative learning capability and the lock-in path via the type of firm‟s diversification. The explorative learning capability tends to be coupled with the unrelated diversification, whereas the lock-in path tends to be coupled with related diversification.
Downloads
References
Anon., 2010. Path dependence and path creation: Alternative theoretical and methodological perspectives on strategy, innovation and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 47(4), pp. 733-5.
Banker, R. D., Wattal, S. and Plehn-Dujowich, J. M., 2011. R&D versus acquisitions: Role of diversification in the choice of innovation strategy by information technology firms. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(2), pp. 109-44.
Barney, J. B., 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), pp. 99-120.
Chen, Y. S., Shih, C. Y. and Chang, C. H., 2012. The effects of related and unrelated technological diversification on innovation performance and corporate growth in the Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. Scientometrics, pp. 1-18.
Chiu, Y. and Liaw, Y., 2009. Organizational slack: Is more or less better? Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(3), pp. 321-42.
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P., 1972. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), pp. 1-25.
Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A., 1989. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99, pp. 569-96.
Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A., 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), pp. 128–52.
Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G., 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJL Prentice-Hall.
Dierickx, I. and Cool, K., 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), pp. 1504-11.
Dimick, D. E. and Murray, V. V., 1978. Correlates of substantive policy decisions in organizations: The case of human resource management. Academy of Management Journal, 21(4), pp. 611-23.
Eisenhardt, K. M. and Martin, J. A., 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp. 1105–21.
Garcia-Vega, M., 2006. Does technological diversification promote innovation? An empirical analysis for European firms. Research Policy, 35(2), pp. 230-46.
Granstrand, O. and Oskarsson, C., 1994. Technology diversification in “MUL-TECH” corporations. Engineering Management, 41(4), pp. 355-64.
Granstrand, O., Patel, P. and Pavitt, K., 1997. Multi-technology corporations: Why they have ‘distributed’ rather than ‘distinctive core’ competencies. California Management Review, 39(4), pp. 8-25.
Katila, R. and Ahuja, G., 2002. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), pp. 1183-94.
Lee, P. M. and O’Neill, H. M., 2003. Ownership structures and R&D investments of US and Japanese firms: Agency and stewardship perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 46, pp. 212-25.
Levinthal, D. A. and March, J. G., 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp. 95-112.
Lin, B. W., Chen, C. J. and Wu, H. L., 2006. Patent portfolio diversity, technology strategy, and firm value. Engineering Management, 53(1), pp. 17-26.
March, J. G., 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), pp. 71−87.
Moses, O. D., 1992. Organizational slack and risk-taking behavior: Tests of product pricing strategy. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 5(3), pp. 38-54.
Mowery, D. C., 1981. The emergence and growth of industrial research in American manufacturing, 1899-1945. Stanford University.
Ng, D. W., 2007, A modern resource based approach to unrelated diversification. Journal of Management Studies, 44(8), pp. 1481-502.
Nohria, N. and Gulati, R., 1996. Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), pp. 1245-64.
Palepu, K., 1985. Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), pp. 239-55.
Quintana-García, C. and Benavides-Velasco, C. A., 2008. Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification. Research Policy, 37(3), pp. 492-507.
Siedentopp, J. and Söllner, A., 2009. Path dependence through corporate political activity. In: Schreyogg, G. and Sydow, J., ed. The hidden dynamics of path dependence: Institutions and organizations. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 71-93.
Suzuki, J. and Kodama, F., 2004. Technological diversity of persistent innovators in Japan: Two case studies of large Japanese firms. Research Policy, 33(3), pp. 531-49.
Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G. and Koch, J., 2009. Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review, 34(4), pp. 689–709.
Thompson, J. D., 1967. Organization in action. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Vergne, J. P. and Durand, R., 2010. The missing link between the theory and empirics of path dependence: Conceptual clarification, testability issue, and methodological implications. Journal of Management Studies, 47(4), pp. 736-59.
Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Progressive Research in Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT
JPRSS is pleased to undertake the publication of your contribution to Journal of Progressive Research in Social Sciences.
The copyright to this article is transferred to JPRSS(including without limitation, the right to publish the work in whole or in part in any and all forms of media, now or hereafter known) effective if and when the article is accepted for publication thus granting JPRSS all rights for the work so that both parties may be protected from the consequences of unauthorized use.