Modelling and Optimization of a Non-Constrained Multi-objective Problem having Multiple Utility Functions using Bayesian Theory

  • Hamed Fazlollahtabar Mazandaran Univrsity of Science and Technology, Babol
  • Pooneh Abbasian Mazandaran Univrsity of Science and Technology, Babol
  • Nezam Mahdavi-Amiri Sharif University of Technology, Tehran
Keywords: Multi-objective model, Multiple utility functions, Bayesian theory.

Abstract

One of the multi-objective optimization methods makes use of the utility function for the objective functions. Utility function creating the most satisfaction answers for decision makers (DMs) by considering the priorities of the DMs; in an available studies; there are only one utility function for each objective function. But due to practical situation in different decision making environments in an industry or trade lead each goal has multiple utility functions. This paper presents a model of multi- objective problem in which each of the objective function has multiple utility function applying Bayesian theory. This model allows DMs to calculate the probability of these utilities using conditional probability in conditions of uncertainty. In addition, examples are given to illustrate the usefulness of this model.

Author Biographies

Hamed Fazlollahtabar, Mazandaran Univrsity of Science and Technology, Babol
Faculty of Management and Technology
Pooneh Abbasian, Mazandaran Univrsity of Science and Technology, Babol
Department of Industrial Engineering
Nezam Mahdavi-Amiri, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran
Faculty of Mathematical Sciences

References

Romero C, Sutcli4e C, Board J, Cheshire P. Naive weighting in non pre-emptive goal programming, viewpoint and reply. Journal of the Operational Research Society 1985;36:6479.

Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Ferguson, R.O., 1955. Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming. Management Science 1, 138151.

Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., 1961. Management model and industrial application of linear programming, vol. 1, Wiley, New York.

Lee, SM., 1972. Goal Programming for Decision Analysis. Philadelphia, PA, Auerbach.

Ignizio, J.P., 1985. Introduction to Linear Goal Programming. Beverly Hills, CA, Sage.

Tamiz, M., J.D., Romero, C., 1998. Goal programming for decision making: an overview of the

current state-of-the-art. European Journal of Operational Research 111, 56781.

Romero C., 2001. Extended Lexicographic Goal Programming: A Unifying Approach. Omega

, 6371.

Chang, C.-T., 2007. Multi-Choice Goal Programming. Omega 35, 389396.

Chang, C.-T., 2008. Revised Multi-Choice Goal Programming. Applied Mathematical

Modeling 32, 25872595.

Chang C-T. On the mixed binary goal programming problems. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2004;159:75968.

Vitoriano B, Romero C. Extended interval goal programming. Journal of Operational Research Society 1999;50: 12803.

M. Tamiz, D.F. Jones, E. El-Darzi, A review of goal programming and its applications, Annals of Operations Research 58 (1993) 3953.

R.B. Flavell, A new goal programming formulation,Omega 4 (1976) 731732.

H.J. Zimmerman, Using fuzzy sets in operational research, European Journal of Operational Research 13 (1983) 201206.

C. Romero, Handbook of Critical Issues in Goal Programming, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1991.

C.A. De Kluyver, An exploration of various goal programming formulations with application

to advertising media scheduling, Journal of the Operational Research Society 30 (1979) 167-171.

W.B. Wildhelm, Extensions of goal programming models,Omega 9 (1981) 212-214.

D.F. Jones, (1995) The Design and Development of an Intelligent Goal Programming System,

Ph.D. Thesis. University of Portsmouth, UK.

A.S. Masud, C.L. Hwang, Interactive sequential goal programming, Journal of the Operational

Research Society 32 (1981) 391400.

Wierzbicki AP. A mathematical basis for satisficing decision making. Mathematical Modelling 1982;3:391405.

Liao, C.-N. (2009). Formulating the multi-segment goal programming. Computer & Industrial Engineering, 56, 138141.

Al-Nowaihi, A., Bradley, I., Dhami, S., 2008. A note on the utility function under prospect theory. Economics Letters 99, 337339.

Yu, B.W.-T., Pang, W.K., Troutt, M.D., Hou, S.H., 2009. Objective comparisons of the optimal portfolios corresponding to different utility functions. European Journal of Operational Research 199, 604610.

Podinovski, V.V., 2010. Set choice problems with incomplete information about the preferences of the decision maker. European Journal of Operational Research 207, 371379.

Chang, C.T., 2011. Multi-choice goal programming with utility functions. European Journal of Operational Research 215, 439445.

A.Olshausen, B., 2004. Bayesian Probability Theory. University of California, Berkeley.

Scharge L. LINGO Release 11.0. LINDO System, Inc.2008.

Chang, C.-T., Chen, H.-M., Zhuang, Z.-Y., 2012. Multi-coefficients goal programming. Computers & Industrial Engineering 62, 616623.

Kettani, O., Aouni, B., Martel, J.M., 2004.the double role of the weight factor in the goal programming model. Computer & Operational Research 31, 1833-1845.

Published
2015-10-11
How to Cite
Fazlollahtabar, H., Abbasian, P., & Mahdavi-Amiri, N. (2015). Modelling and Optimization of a Non-Constrained Multi-objective Problem having Multiple Utility Functions using Bayesian Theory. Journal of Information Sciences and Computing Technologies, 4(3), 332-342. Retrieved from http://scitecresearch.com/journals/index.php/jisct/article/view/393
Section
Articles