Point-Of-Sales Systems in Food and Beverage Industry: Efficient Technology and Its User Acceptance
Abstract
The objective of the study was to review the factors that influence the acceptance of the points of sales (POS) technology, as the main systems used in the restaurants environment. It is critical that those POS perceived as proper use for the business growth and development. A conceptual framework is explained by the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), were reviewed 28 research articles associated with the acceptance of the points of sales (POS) technology. The literature evidence found indicates the acceptance of POS systems in the F&B industry, including those factors which may affect its implementation and use. Attitude toward POS is affected by individual differences, times, training and company supports. Perceived usefulness of the POS is influenced by information quality, benefits information. The perceived ease of use of the POS is influence by enjoyment. Therefore, that strategy implementation, employee learning, ethical decisions, positive employeemanagement relationship, and personalization level are factors that support technology acceptance.Downloads
References
Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.R, Todd, P. A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 227–248.
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sciences, 30(2), 361-391.
Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theorical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Delone, W.H., McLean, E.R. (2003). The Delone and McLean model of information system success: a ten year update. Journal of Management Information System. 19(4),9-30.
Hoehle, H., & Venkatesh, V. (2015). Mobile application usability: conceptualization and instrument development. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 435-472.
Hong, W., Thong, J., Wong, W., and Tam, K. (2002). Determinants of User Acceptance of Digital Libraries:Empirical Examination of Individual Differences and System Characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems. 18(3), 97-124.
Isaacman, J. (2014). 6 Ways to Improve POS Security. Restaurant Hospitality, 98(9), 39.
Lu, J., Yu, C., Liu, C., & Yao, J. (2003). Technology acceptance model for wireless Internet. Internet Research, 13(3), 206-222.
Kimes, S. E. (2008). The role of technology in restaurant revenue management. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 49(3), 297.
Koufaris, M. (2002). Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 205.
Leonard, L. N. K., & Cronan, T. P. (2005). Attitude toward ethical behavior in computer use: A shifting model. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(9), 1150-1171.
Li, X., Hess, T. J., McNab, A. L., & Yu, Y. (2009). Culture and acceptance of global web sites: A cross-country study of the effects of national cultural values on acceptance of a personal web portal. Database for Advances in Information Systems, 40(4), 62-87.
Li, Y., Tan, C., Xu, H., & Teo, H. (2011). Open source software adoption: Motivations of adopters and amotivations of non-adopters. Database for Advances in Information Systems, 42(2), 76-94.
Lung H., & Peng L. (2004). Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information & Management. 41, 853-868.
Moon, J.W., Kim, Y.G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information and Management. 38(4), 217-230.
National Restaurant Association (2016). Facts at A Glance. Retrieved on June 26, 2016 of
http://www.restaurant.org/News-Research/Research/Forecast-20162016.
Park, K., Lee, S., & Khan, M.A. (2014). Exploring the impact of franchise support on franchisee acceptance of intranet in quick service restaurant (QSR) franchise system. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 5(2), 143.
Rai, A., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R. B. (2002). Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis. Information Systems Research, 13(1), 50.
Scherer, A., Wünderlich, N., & Wangenheim, F. (2015). The Value of Self-Service: Long-Term Effects of Technology-Based Self-Service Usage on Customer Retention. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 177-200.
Spears, J. L., and Barki, H. (2010). User participation in information systems security risk management, MIS Quarterly, 34(3), 503-522.
Sundarraj, R., & Manochehri, N. (2011). Application of an Extended TAM Model for Online Banking Adoption: A Study at a Gulf-region University. Information Resources Management Journal. 24(1), 1-13.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176.
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186.
Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478
Weiyin, H., Thong, J. Y., Wai-man, W., & Kar-yan, T. (2001). Determinants of User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: An Empirical Examination of Individual Differences and System Characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 97-124.
Wu, M., & Kuo, F. (2008). An empirical investigation of habitual usage and past usage on technology acceptance evaluations and continuance intention. Database for Advances in Information Systems, 39(4), 48-73.
Copyright (c) 2017 Journal of Information Sciences and Computing Technologies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT
JISCT is pleased to undertake the publication of your contribution to Journal of Information Sciences and Computing Technologies
The copyright to this article is transferred to JISCT(including without limitation, the right to publish the work in whole or in part in any and all forms of media, now or hereafter known) effective if and when the article is accepted for publication thus granting JISCT all rights for the work so that both parties may be protected from the consequences of unauthorized use.
