Quantum Conversation
Abstract
This article is a sequel to the paper published earlier entitled (A new approach to gauge theory and variational principal). It is assumed that atoms are engaged in a perpetual conversation called Quantum Conversation,
and the behavior of an atom varies based on the syntax, and the tonality, derived from the spectral terms. Accepting this premise, it is then explored how to identify Quantum Conversation, (QC). Quantum
Conversation could be identied through looking at atom from a fresh point of view. Mainly this includes re-interpreting spin, and split identied by the spectral terms which is the other behavioral characteristic of quantum particles. Split is dened both as the change in the orbit level, and the division of an atom into smaller elements. Spin, and split change as a result of Q.C. Q.C. has two major elements, 1) syntax, and 2) tonality.
Given the dynamics and the diverse nature of syntax combined with tonality, it makes it possible to imagine and analyze a great number of scenarios for the behavior of the elements of an atom that would not be
possible to observe through laboratory experiments. This would open the door to a deeper understanding of the life of an atom.
Downloads
References
1997.
[2] E., Cartan, The theory of spinors, Dover Publication Inc., New York, 1981.
[3] L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum mechanics (Non-Relativistic Theory,
Pergamon Third Edition, New York, 1977.
[4] R.P. Feynman, R.B. Leighton, M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics,
Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA., USA 1965.
[5] A. Sommerfeld, Zur Theorie des Zeeman-Eekts der Wasserstoinien mit einem
Anhang ber den Stark-Eekt , Phy. Z. vol. 17 (1977), 491-507.
[6] A. Lande, Termstruktur und Zeemaneekt der Multipletts, Phy. Z. vol. 15 (1923),
189-205.
[7] W. Pauli, Uber die Gesetzmaigkeiten des anomalen Zeemaneektes, Phy. Z. vol.
16 (1923), 155-164.
[8] F. Archilli et al., Flavor changing Neutral Currents Making and Breaking the
Standard Model , Nature, Vol. 546, pages 221-226. 2017.
[9] G. Ciezarek, A Challenge to Lepton Universality in B-meson Decays, Nature,
Vol. 546, pages 227-233. 2017.
[10] E. Williams, Representation Theory, The MIT Press, Massachusetts, USA. 2003.
[11] M.M. Khoshyaran, A new approach to gauge theory and variational principal,
Journal of Progressive Research in Mathematics. 14(2) (2018), 2341-2360 .
[12] M. Johnson, Embodied Meaning and Cognitive Science, Art,Philosophy Journal,
pages 148-358. 1997.
[13] A. Einstein, Investigation on the theory of the Brownian Movement L, Dover
publication Inc. NY USA, 1926.
[14] N.K. Sedov, Trigonometric Series and Their Applications (in Russian), Fizmatgiz,
Moscow 1961.
[15] G. Wilkinson, Measuring Beauty, Special Collectors Edition, Scientic American,
pages 5-11, Spring 2019.
[16] P. Koskela,P. Lammi, V. Manojlovic, Gromov Hyperbolicity and Quasi hyperbolic
Geodesics, Annales Scientics de l'Ecole Normale Superieure , 4e serie, 47, 2014,
p. 975-990.
[17] M.M. Khoshyaran, Homology Theory on Causal Random Groups, Journal of Progressive
Research in Mathematics. 17(1) (2020), 73-99.
[18] L. Auslander, R. E. MacKenzie, Introduction to Dierentiable Manifolds, Dover
Publications Inc. Mineola, New York. 2009.
[19] J. E. Charon, L'esprit et la Relativit Complexe et l'unication de l'ensemble des
quatre interactions phsyques , Edition Albin Michel, Paris, 1987.
[20] J. E. Charon, La Relativit Complexe Introduction la Psychophysique , Edition
Albin Michel, Paris, 1983.
[21] A. Kono, D. Tamaki, Generalized Cohomology , Iwanami Shoten Publishers,
Tokyo, 2002.
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Progressive Research in Mathematics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
