FIRST DECISION: NATURE OF THE MODELLING WORK

Marcia Pinheiro

Marcia Pinheiro ICSE -DE, USA PO BOX 12396 A’Beckett St. Melbourne, VIC, 8006, Australia

Keywords: paradoxes, sorites, liar, hanging, russell's

Abstract

We here talk about worst mistakes in terms of determining the nature of the modelling work involved in a certain situation. We use our results on a few paradoxes (Sorites, Liar, Hanging, and Russell’s) to make a point on the nature of the work involved. It Is easy to notice that the mentioned paradoxes arise because people have committed mistakes in their analyses. By explaining the mentioned paradoxes and their solutions, we get to understand that better. Understanding that better, we get to learn how to avoid these problems in the future and, with that, we optimize the use of resources in Science.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Pinheiro, M. R. A Solution to The Sorites, Semiotica. (2006). 160 307–326.

Weisstein, E. W. Sorites Paradox. (2015). Accessed on the 21st of December of 2015 http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SoritesParadox.html

Pinheiro, M. R. Infinis. Protosociology.(2009). 160 1–13.

Pinheiro, M. R. Concerning the Solution to the Liar Paradox. E-Logos. (2012). 21

Pinheiro, M. R.The Unexpected Hanging Problem and a Trivial, but Unexpected, Solution. Advances in Research. (2015). 4(1) 36–44.

Pinheiro, M. R. Concerning the Solution to the Russells Paradox. E-Logos. (2012). 20 1–16.

Weisstein, E. W.Russell’s Antinomy. (2016). Retrieved Jan 22nd 2016 from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RussellsAntinomy.html

Weisstein, E. W. Principle of Mathematical Induction. (2015). Retrieved Dec 21st 2015 from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PrincipleofMathematicalInduction.html

Pinheiro, M. R.Automation of the Linguistic Translation Processes: A Study on Viability. Semiotica. (2011). 187

Pinheiro, M. R. Words for Science. Indian Journal of Applied Research. (2015). 1(5) 19–22.