Safflower Performance under Different Water Intervals in North and Khartoum States

  • Yassin Ibrahim Dagash Sudan University Of Science and Technology College Of Agricultural Studies.
  • Nahid Abd Alfattah Khalil Sudan University Of Science and Technology College Of Agricultural Studies.
  • Samia Osman Yagoub Sudan University Of Science and Technology College Of Ag.ricultural Studies
  • Sami Abd elGafar Mahgoub University of Dongola College Of Agriculture Science.
Keywords: Safflower, Water interval, Location, Geiza.


Two field experiments were conducted at the Experimental farm in Agricultural Studies College, Sudan University of Science and Technology at Khartoum state ,and Agricultural Science College, Dongola University in Northern State in winter of 2011/2012. The experiments were conducted to study the effect of locations and three water intervals (7,14and 21days) on growth and seed yield of two varieties of safflower,(Gieza and Baldi varieties) .The experiment was laid out in Factorial Randomized Block Design with 3 replications. The results indicated that location and varieties had a significant effect on growth attributes (Plant height, number of leaves/plant, number of branches /plant and stem diameter) and on yield characters ( number of seeds /capsule, thousand seed weight) .Location and variety displayed significant effect on number of seeds /capsules. Geiza variety gave promising results in term of vegetative growth (plant height) and number of seeds/capsule and seed yield more than Baldi (P ?0.05). Water intervals significantly affected thousand seed weight and irrigation every 7 and 14 day were more suitable compared to 21 day interval. There were negative correlation between number of seeds /capsule and plant population and stem diameter . Seed yield expressed similar trend with the same parameters. Moreover seed yield was positively correlated with plant population ,plant height and number of seeds / capsule.


Download data is not yet available.


Ashrafi E, Razmjoo K. (2010). Effect of irrigation regimes on oil content and composition of safflower (Cartham tinctorius L.) cultivars. J Am Oil Chemist Soc. 87:499–506.

Blackshaw RE. ( 1993). Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) density and row spacing effects on competition with green foxtail (Setaria viridis). Weed Sci. 41:403–408.

Burhan, A., E., Esendal, and Z. Ekin.( 2001). The effects of N application times on morphology, yield and quality characters of safflower. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Safflower Conference, North Dakota, USA, eds. J. W. Bergman and H. H. Mundel, pp. 203–207. Williston, ND: North Dakota University.

Elfatih.E.A.Elkarim, and Mustafa.A.M.Idris(2004). Response of Wheat to manure and phosphors fertilization in the high terraces soil of northern Sudan .

Emongor, V. (2010). Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) the underutilized and neglected crop: a review. Asian Journal of Plant Science, 9,299–306.

Esendal, E. ( 1997). Agro-physiology Outlook on Safflower. In: The IVth International Safflower Conference, eds. A. Corleto, H.-H. Mundel, pp. 155–161. Bari, Italy: Adriatica Editrice

Hashemi-Dezfuli A (1994). Manipulation of crowding stress in corn. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Massachusetts. Amherst. U. S. A.

Robinson.,R.G. and Otto,.,H.J. ( 1967). Safflower - An Oilseed Crop for Minnesota. Agronomy Factsheet- No. 10, University of Minnesota Agricultural Extension Service.

Smith, H.A. C. Rust, D. Baldridge, J. Bergman, and J. Caprio, (1989). Safflower A Montana Specialty Crop. No. MT 8916., Montana State University Extension Service, Bozeman

Singh, Vrijendra, J. H. Akade and N. Nimbkar. (2007). Existence of apomixis in safflower. Extended Summaries. National Seminar on “Changing Global Vegetable Oils Scenario: Issues and Challenges before India: January 29-31, 2007, DOR, Hyderabad. pp. 110-111.

Statgraphics (1985-1989). Statgraphics Statistical Graphics

Systems, v.4.0. Rockville, MD: STSC

Sayed, T.Abdelhalim(2012). Development and integration of biocontrol products in branched broomrape (Pheilipanche ramose) mangment in tomato .Phd thises.

Steer BT, Harrigan EKS.( 1986). Rate of nitrogen supply during different developmental stages effect yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Field Crop Res. 14: 221–231.

Mosallayi A.A, Sharifmogaddasi M.R. and 2Omidi A.H. (2011) Evaluation of Different Irrigation Regimes Effects on Grain Yield and Some Important Traits of New Iranian Safflower Cultivars.Journal of Advances in Environmental Biology, 5(5): 868-871, 2011

McPherson MA, Allen GG, Keith A, Topinka C, Linda MH. (2004). Theoretical hybridization potential of transgenic safflower with weedy relatives in the New World. Can J Plant Sci. 84:923–934.

Nagaraj, G., and P. S. Reddy. 1997. Some factors influencing safflower seed and oil quality. In: IVth International Safflower Conference, eds. A. Corleto, and H.-H. Mundel, pp. 347–349. Bari, Italy: Adriatica Editrice.

Ravi S, Channal HT, Hebsur NS, Patil BN, Dharmatti PR, (2008). Effect of sulphur, zinc and iron nutrition on growth, yield, nutrient uptake and quality of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 21: 382-385.

Tabatabaei, S. A GH. Zarei and P. Aghaei. (2010). Study of relationships between agronomic characteristics and yield in autumnal safflower, pp 51, M. Sc. Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Maybod Branch, Iran.

Weiss, E. A.( 2000). Oilseed Crops. Oxford: Blackwell Science.

Weiss, E.A., (2000a. Oilseed Crops (2nd edition), Blackwell Science Ltd., pp: 109.

Zaman A and Das PK( 1998)Growth and yield performance of safflower under different nitrogen levels in semi arid tropics. Annuals of Arid Zone 29(2) 141-14

Zahra Bitarafan Amir Hossein Shirani Rad, Babak Delkhosh(1995) Changes in Yield and Morphologic Traits of Spring Safflower as Affected by Nitrogen Rates and Sowing Dates Journal of Advances in Environmental Biology, 6(1): 72-78, 2012

How to Cite
Dagash, Y., Khalil, N. A., Yagoub, S., & Mahgoub, S. (2015). Safflower Performance under Different Water Intervals in North and Khartoum States. Journal of Progressive Research in Biology, 2(1), 37-42. Retrieved from